Next time JJ I'd rather you call me a name, Also when you post research off the web post a link to show all the information contained not just the select information that does not give the true meaning. Are you still trying to suggest that an imbalance of power does not have to exist in order to bully someone.

Jimmy my reply was to your comment " Jimmi, I think that you should revisit your definatuion of Bullying. Bullying is making attacks at someone who is incapeable of defending themselves."

I googled it and used the first source I found which was wikipedia. I suppose you are correct. I should have posted the link to wikipedia but I thought by saying I got the definition from wikipedia it was clear since to the best of my knowledge there is only one wikipedia. Since you asked me to "revisit your definatuion of Bullying" it seem logical to me to use the explanation listed under the heading DEFINITION. I've typed definition in capitols not to make a point but because that is how the heading was typed so you could see exactly where i found the definition. I also made the assumption that when you said "definatuion" you meant definition.

I have no interest in calling you or anyone else names. I don't understand why you would want me to call you names.

I think I clearly stated my position when I said " Whether you feel people can defend themselves or not it doesn't change the facts. Call it what ever you like if you don't like the term bullying. Any poster shouldn't be calling people names."

I have not come across you original definition of bullying "Bullying is making attacks at someone who is incapeable of defending themselves." Like I said above you can call it what ever you want.

In my last post to you I said" I have a feeling that no matter what I say here you will not find it acceptable so I will leave you with this."

I respect your right to defend a friend who you may feel was wronged but this has no longer become a discussion worth continuing unless we can move forward from our current stance.

JJ