Are you speaking as a shareholder or for management? If you can observe what has transpired without seeing the injustice to shareholders, I question the motive behind your post. Are you appealing to shareholders to be satisfied with whatever settlement management decided to make without questioning conflicts of interest? With information only management knew in advance, the terms of the agreement were negotiated and increased from 35% to 88%, shouldn't shareholders be privy to know who made the decision and whether or not it was at arm's length? It would be good to know who the people are that were associated with Tenor at the time concessions were made. Who knows whether or not management will give away more before we receive anything.