This certainly sounds like a positive development.

However, I cannot read it because I do not subscribe to the 360 Law Review. I suspect that more than one of us here does.

Would it be possible for someone who does have access to the item through membership in 360 Law to summarize very briefly the gist of the article?

Excellent sleuthing, IFY, and thank you for this and your many other wonderful finds. Thanks optimistcally in advance for helping with my request, and happy spring time to all.

thelongrunner