Don - yes we as shareholders may be affected by what Gowling do on behalf of their clients (both positively and negatively). Just as we are affected by Reyes' lawyers, Tenor's lawyers, etc. But there is a difference, Gowling are the only lawyers on a contingency basis.

There, you got it right. Now a question for you. Which lawyers would you rather be affected by, Tenors? Or the Committes(ours)? So I guess they(Gowling) are fighting in our best interest,no?

I never said I hired a lawyer, I opted in, you twisting words again.

But can I talk to your gut now? Because it must be your gut saying you are "in on that". Neither Gowling nor the opt in committee have told you anything new or added any value so it must be your gut again. So can your gut tell me if it believes in "somewhere over the rainbow"? You know where skies are blue and dreams really do come true.

Just more blah blah.