Brad I'm thinking this was availiable from the Monitors report a few months ago. I remember reading this before. So it is out there. The big "However" bugged me back then also after calculating the burn rate reported in the financial reports.

The last request to the Judge about being paid for the previous bondholder incurred court costs is as much about continuing operations as it is about continuing these large salaries.

IMO there will be a revised estimate at some point in the future and IMO Tenor will be offering more cash to continue this through the end. They did not enter into this DIP arrangement based on our Management's expectations, but on the likelihood of a return on their investment.