it considers “treason to the mother country” state handling of gold

Welcome to the Crystallex HUB on AGORACOM

Crystallex International Corporation is a Canadian-based gold company with a successful record of developing and operating gold mines in Venezuela and elsewhere in South America

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

cantjustread

Rank: President [?]

Points: 27032 [?]

Votes: 190 Score: 3.4 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

it considers “treason to the mother country” state handling of gold

posted on Sep 01, 2011 07:24AM

Of Grazia it considers “treason to the mother country” state handling of gold

Monday, 29 of November of 1999

“They are going to eliminate the gold reserves, and it are going away to give to countries that doubt the permanence of president Chávez in the power”, it notices the member parliamentarian of the commission of mines.

Marks David Valverde
Antonio photo Garci'a Jr/File

Of Grazia it defended the positions of Julio Montoya on the case

Américo De Grazia appeals to history to explain the case that concerns to him: “The Venezuelan gold reserves are in England, Norway, Belgium and Germany. They are countries with which Venezuela does not have debts, nor dark records in financial matter. That cannot be said of Russia, to which (in addition) during the Spanish Civil War, by ideological affinity, the gold reserves of Spain were given to him. What happened? That still today Spain is litigating the delivery of the gold reserves. Were not given you them assumed nor like financial strengths to consider that the government of Frank was illegal”.

Now yes, it lands at present: for the deputy of the Radical and integral Cause of the Commission of Mines of the National Assembly, the “true truth” is not solely the repatriation of gold, but the “flight of those goods towards China, Brazil and Russia”.

We are going “Them to deposit in those countries where Venezuela yes has debts. That can be considered treason to the mother country, because it is to remove them from good a safe place and defense, and to mortgage them in countries where Venezuela already has debts”, warns.

To remember Montoya
Of Grazia it stands out that the decision of the Government to repatriate the auriferous reserves, obeyed to a strategy to mitigate the denunciations of the deputy Julio Montoya (UNT-Zulia), who was first in alerting what the true intention of that measurement considered.

After the analyses, Of Grazia it refers that the reasons that moved to Hugo Chavez to remove gold from those countries have handle, mainly, in the decline of the economy of Venezuela.

“They are going to eliminate the gold reserves, and you are going away to give to countries that doubt the permanence of president Chávez in the power, of the favorable electoral results to the regime in 2012 and, somehow, they want to guarantee, with gold reserves, the debts possibly contracted with Venezuela, and that has not been sufficiently transparent”, it thinks.

Incongruities
The deputy of the Radical Cause stands out that scopes exist, related to the repatriation of the auriferous reserves, that wake up mistrusts between the competing large stone bench of the National Assembly.

“Venezuela is going to pay by transfer and insurance, 300 million dollars. Now, the single industrial engine power upgrade of Minerven, would cost to the State 50 million to him dollars. For that, Venezuela does not have money”, is sorry.

It does not have, in conclusion of the deputy, nothing that to celebrate on the matter: “It is a dangerous play and cynical”.

To remember and to live

Américo de Grazia remembers that, between end of the years 80 and principles of the 90 of the last century, many of the governmental spokesmen who today support repatriation, are the same that, from the extinct Congress of the Republic, were against the same measurement.

“We spoke than they call IV the Republic. We, Cause R, were against for the same reasons that today we are against, because we had a State spendthrift. Between the group they were, for example, Aristóbulo Istúriz and Alí Rodriguez”, specific.