The political bureau of PSUV-Bolivar lamented the “administrative disaster” in Sifontes. Photo courtesy Interior Press
How respond you to accuse those who it to have interference in the Chancellor case?
- They do not deserve answer.
No type of answer?
- That they present/display some test, then. That they say: “I accuse Francisco Rangel, with these tests, by to have acted in this case”.
And it was not necessary to say more. At least during the press conference that, this Monday, offered the governor of the state Bolivar, Francisco Rangel Go'mez, in relation to the governmental actions before the consequences of rains and on a subject not less thorny: the ignorance of Carlos Chancellor like mayor of the Sifontes municipality.
After to talk about to the subject of rains, Rangel Go'mez entered completely in the other subject. A sentence was the announcement of its entrance in that land: “we were sorry, deeply, that hoped that the period exceeded years both to take the measurement that was taken and to act, when that absolute absence of the elect mayor has had to decree itself, practically, within the framework of the 90 days after the electoral process of two years ago”.
It said it For the Governor, the vindication of the City council of Sifontes only has a way: the inquiry, by illegality, of all the administrative acts during those two years.
“Why we considered illegality? Because they do not exist, in the Constitution of the Bolivariana Republic of Venezuela, a position that “substitute mayoress” says. That exists nowhere, and therefore, all those administrative acts are illegal”, argued.
It assured that “we are going to continue supporting the town of Sifontes and working with all our force like Interior and political party that we are, as well as is very advanced (sic) the cover of the population with the potable water, and we go to continue asphalting the population of Tumeremo”. (MDV)
|