I'm on a roll. I asked RM why they have not issued a PR concerning the delay. He referred me back to the primary binding agreement. Because there have been NO MATERIAL CHANGES, it would be a lengthy exercise with China to get that done. They would prefer China to focus their energy on getting the agreements done. If there had been a material change in the process (i.e. termination or a change in the terms) then KRY could and would have issued a PR updating the shareholders. KRY doesn't need China approval to issue a PR if there is a material change. Hope this helps

Being a shareholder in KRY has caused me to have a split personality. I often find myself giving a thumbs up to those who see the glass half empty and to those who see the glass half full. Both sides express hopes and frustrations I feel. Although we occassionally have some family fights, this is a great board.