My sense of the agreement is that KRY's past expenditures on social programs (e.g. the medical facility, roads, etc), required to remain compliant under the terms of the MOC, do not figure in the agreement and therefore have been absorbed by KRY shareholders.

While this shortcoming is not a dealbreaker by any means, I would think that CRRC should have been pinned to 2/3 of the compliance costs - easier said than done, no doubt.