Thanks No Bear, then in no way the noteholders could have any relationship to some of these larger investors with KRY that have more pull in the voting? The only reason I ask when you read some of the court docs it seemed like the noteholders would have liked certain people replaced. Just wanting to make sure that couldn't happen. I would imagine with a legal battle in the courts they would be barred from any affiliation with any investor or themselves that has an interest in voting on management and/or buying up shares so they could have a majority vote.