The president of the Republic, Hugo Chavez, has asked for the National Assembly that creates a law to force the public companies to operate under a model in which their production is handled by a state being, there will be no capital gain and will depend on a budget contributed by the Executive. According to the vice-president of the Association of Metallurgical Industrialists and Mining of Venezuela (AIMM), Jorge Roig, these requests will not give results, and they will only generate more bureaucracy.

▪ Maria Ramirez Hair
mramirez@correodelcaroni.com This direction of electronic mail is protected against robots of Spam, needs to have activated Javascript to be able to see it
Photo William Urdaneta

Not to place the production in the market would affect the financial and operative stability of the public companies

In the dominical program Aló President Nº 349, the national agent chief executive maintained that “the company is not going to depend on the sale of its production”, but of an annual budget contributed by the State to subsist.

A state being would be in charge of the commercialization of the production of the state ones to prices of costs and without capital gain. “It is necessary to create a commercial being but that works, that is really working and that receives that production and it distributes soon it, eliminating the capital gain and the character of merchandise of the production”, it said.

This desire abre the doors to a scene in which the social” production takes relevance “, already mentioned by the agent chief executive in previous opportunities.

Factories of the State as Alcasa has been registering red balances for years, because their low production and the swelling in their costs of operation has prevented that the financial results become of blue. Not even, the support of the State has allowed re-floats of this type of industries that, on the contrary, show to forts signs of deterioration and improductividad.

Experts consider that this I exhort to produce under a scheme without benefits will take to the companies to a field in which the survival will be made uphill.

The vice-president of the Association of Metallurgical Industrialists and the Mining of Venezuela (AIMM), Jorge Roig, considers that this desire of the Chief of State differs with force of the principles of the enterprise movement of freedom of company, free initiative and decentralization.

In his opinion, to concentrate the operations of the public companies in a state being is a serious managemental error, stoked mainly by the absolute ignorance of the reality of some industries of the State. “A citizen of Caracas cannot know with depth which is happening in Guayana, and vice versa”, it indicated.

Also the director of National Fedecámaras - by the sector of Mining it indicated that the industries have an own life and need to produce benefits to cover their operative expenses as well as of investment. “It must have an accumulation of capital its investments and to pay the dividends to the shareholders. If it is not reversed in the long run the companies they deteriorate and they cannot continue producing”.

Rotten apples
That a state being, since has proposed it president Chávez, controls the commercialization and, therefore, concentrates the economic resources is a serious error, “it is to put apples rotted with the good ones, and after a time all will be rotten”.

“Bauxilum could be successful if Alcasa and Venalum had paid the accounts to him, it would be a silver cup; and the same happens to Edelca, if the basic companies paid to him”, indicated.

According to Roig, the creation of a state being that controls the commercialization of the production of the public companies with socialist criteria, would allow to inject resources in structurally broken industries like Alcasa, but they would be stopped guaranteeing the necessary investments in productive and healthful companies.

“All the money of Sidor goes to the Venezuelan Corporation of Guayana, administers that it, a part to Sidor returns to him and to the other it uses it part for his operations, and nowadays Sidor is not healthy”, said.

The vice-president of the AIMM maintained that “these declarations of the president are very unfortunate, and I do not augur good results to him, but an increase of the bureaucracy”.

Premeditaded plan
The main director of the Iron and steel of the Orinoco Alfredo Maneiro (Sidor) in representation of the shareholders class “B”, Pedro Coins, showed that the call to create a law to adapt the model of production to the leftist scheme “is a step more to the implantation of a political project over a plan of national development”.

In the case of Sidor, he indicated, the consumation of this strategy would constitute itself like a violation to the deprived property, because this one is a abierto company of capital, considering that 80% are in the hands of the State and 20% rest into the hands of shareholders “B”.

“This ratifies that this it is a social-rentista and geopolitical model”, asserted.

Also the shareholder of the steel mill maintained that this strategy does not guarantee the survival of the state ones, which acquires force if she considers herself that “at this point the Government has not been able to explain the paralyzation of Tavsa, neither the paralyzation of the estatizadas briqueteras, nor the loss of the production in more of 50% of the plant of pellets of Ferrominera Orinoco nor the deterioration of the ship canal of the Orinoco that only can transport a third of the material that normally moves”.

He maintained that this it is a “premeditaded plan of destruction of the companies of Guayana that looks for that every time we are more employees of the rent of the State, even though that means to put the future in risk of the next generations”.

The Capital

In Marxist economy, the capitalist payment to the worker a wage inferior to the value of the developed work. The paid value was not denominated by Karl Marx like capital gain, the base of the gain of the industralists.

“The production of absolute capital gain is obtained prolonging the day of work beyond the point in which the worker limits itself to produce an equivalent of the value of his force of work, and causing that this plustrabajo takes control the capital”, indicates Marx, in the Capital.

War to the capital gain

“That one pluscuálido that does not want to correct (...) we cleared its business to him, is found since we have done before with many companies, since it took control of the banks, first behind closed doors. And if a law made lack, Cilia (Flowers) I ask to you that please names an equipment of jurists of the National Assembly. If it were necessary for pluscuálidos or the pluscualidismos, but I believe that with the laws that we have it is sufficient”, declared.
Aló President
10 of January of 2010

“We are going to eliminate a factor that already indicated to Carlos Marx in its work the Capital; capital gain, that is one of the so many factors that Capitalism uses to explode to the town”, indicated.
O'Leary place
23 of January of 2010

“We must lower the capitalist capital gain. We are going to create a new social commerce, just and Socialist, eliminating the capitalist poison”, said.
Productive I Encuentro Bottom Bicentennial
28 of January of 2010