Let's not be foolish - stick to our Contract (MOC).

The idea that after all we have been through, the money we've spent, the things we have built, the bonds we have paid, etc., etc., KRY should change the Contract?

Nuts!

Remember, all the expenses we must pay for, VZ. doesn't pay a dime, and KRY must go 50/50 on the profits?

As it stands, our Contract, using present projected expenses, turns out to be 40/60 split.

The Bondholders invested their Funds based on the present Contract, and any reduction in the terms could win them their case because it reduces the value of the Bondholders security.

Changing the Contract would win the Bondholders Case for them.