Suppose someone in the company said to me that we could be looking at a very long sideways period as that's normal for a deposit like this. Is that insider info? Second, suppose I put events that follow together with that and come up with a view by examining the trades that at a certain point we begin to show all the earmarks of HFT and it just so happens to coincide with all the pp's going to EE. Is that bashing? What if someone comes to me with a prediction that smacks of inside knowledge that pans out? Is that my fault? I had a very different view up till then. You go look at the last two years of trading and refute my contentions about the trading. Put together all the Shows, NRs and other public events with the sp and compare it to 40 other companies and then explain to me why the pattern emerges that I found. Show me where every NR there's even a small run up like a normal company.

The problem for you is you will probably be too lazy to do it and if you did, you'd see exactly what I see. Then you would have no way to explain it. There's no point trying to belittle me or deny it until you do the work. Yes, I know that the HFT could be from anywhere in the world. However, the concurrence of events suggests otherwise.

I know of another small outfit that drilled 25 holes last year while doing air studies. They out worked us and out spent us. They have 1/10th of what we have. This year they are drilling a lot more while doing more air studies including a LIDAR. They are "district" mapping. They already have assays back and started later than us and drilled deeper.

Now you in your brilliance, please explain why we are humping the puppy again.

Please explain why we bought a few dogs that we are not going to be able to sell with the package and how that is shareholder advantage and how it fits in with the liquidity event.

If you're not going to do that then it's time for you to appologize for being lazy and name calling.