Im just going to add a little bit as well to this.

When youve been warned multiple times to knock it off and you dont.....you need to assume some of the responsibility for what happened.

That being said Ive sent a letter to AG and Ive started a thread on the hub leaders forum regarding either a new, seventh rule, or an amendment to the existing rule # 2.

Constant, incessant, personal attacks can be called fighting the good fight, exposing bashers, protecting our investment, whatever you like to butter them up as. However, at least where I come from, its usually just called HARASSMENT.

Proposed rule/amendment is NO HARASSMENT...and this would include unsubstantiated opinions regarding other posters true identities.

If youre going to harass other people, you face the consequences and backlash that will stem from it. Thats all thats happened with this fiasco and nothing else.

Just like in the bar fellas...if you're going to punch someone, you're going to get punched back.

There certainly was no problem attacking an alleged "basher", and then the slander that followed. The "attack" on Foxy was simply a few people putting their opinions out there about the irony of the situation. I still have yet to see a shred of proof that anyone on this board is a legitimate paid basher.

Although I also recieved 3 personal emails from Foxy calling me out regarding my post, which after I reviewed hasnt broken any of the 6 rules unless you count my use of the word WAY as yelling.

Foxy didnt break any of the rules this is true, but she had been reminded multiple times about her behaviour, and her constant harassment of posters based on opinions only. If she does come back this behaviour has to stop.

Rogue,