My interpretation is that the PEA data is robust and minimal work is required to pass the next gate.

After $85 million spent by CUU on the Bankable 2012 Schaft Creek Feasibility Study plus 8.5 years of optimizations thereon by the operator Teck, I would have to agree with you there...

But a need to further derisk the project has never been the impedement to '' ''surfacing value'' '' ...


My apologies .... perhaps the most deserving part of that post of the double quotation marks is the joke related to   '' '' TecK optimizations of SC" " ....what a load of,... well...you know what....
jmho