"...interesting that Scotia Capital didn't seemed worried (political risk) about their Chilean permitted Santo Domingo property, which is suppose to start construction Q4"

Its called putting on a brave face and talking up your book (i.e. putting lipstick on a pig), just like Teck is doing publically with its Peruvian and Chilean assets in the face of great economic and political uncertainty.  Possibilities of complete project loss even.

You promote what you want to get rid of and you hide what you want to keep.  Its the key that connects all the dots with Teck's starkly different approach to Schaft Creek of 'Not surfacing its true value and not acknowledging, much less promoting, its sanction-ready status'. 

JMHO