"Correcto,

Anyway the very wrong statement isn't around how much we got, it's that we EARNED 25% not gave away 75% for it. There is a big big difference. "

You are correct and I DID say it wrong in my post. Teck did back in for 75% so the money spent by CUU on Schaft Creek was to EARN their roughly 25% of the project. But, this whole thread has been turned around. It started out about what to expect, how much we might get, and where did all that money go and and turned into yet another lenghty breakdown and arguement on exactly how much it was that Teck paid them, why it was paid, how we got it and who said what to who five years ago. I guess the big question is what the heck is going to happen next...?

CG