"Its good to know that whoever screwed up the drilling is no longer associated with this project." Hoghead

The drilling was not 'screwed up' as you say. The FACTS are they were chasing visuals, there was never any intention of logging and assaying anything other then visual mineralization. They logged and assayed obviously mineralized intervals and left the rest of the core alone, did not log.

Today we know sections of core NOT visually mineralized can carry .2 even up to .4% Cu mineralization. Thus relogging/assaying of legacy core is an important project to undertake. not only should it increase the resource, perhaps tremendousely but we also might start to get an idea of constraints and overall grade might even improve in that area.

Ignorance is a temporary condition easily cured by education.

ttfn

nopoo2