"...And yes, it is also my opinion that the principals to the agreement are in violation of its terms."

Fair enough. And given that the agreement constitutes the basis of what passes for retail investor due diligence for most of us, the perception that the principals are changing the rules without informing retail investors is what is at issue. It's my guess that we've all been very patient in giving CUU the benefit of the doubt in accepting that what is going on behind the scenes is to the mutual benefit of CUU and its shareholders. If we accept as well that the SEDAR thing and the 30 day review are legitimate parts of the process heretofore not mentioned rather than delaying tactics (for whatever reason), that still brings us to March 4 (or is it 6?) as the time when there should be some answers.

Edit: just saw golfyeti's note re 30 days. OK, also fair enough. Still a bit odd considering that Teck has been in on the FS preparation the whole time. What do they want 30 days for?