Here's a little excerpt from the third quarter MD&A, dated Sept. 25, 2012, stating why the focus was only on the other zones for 2012. No drilling of ES and GK, but more mapping and sampling of those areas to go along with the drilling in Mike and Discovery. Still can't figure why we didn't shoot a few holes in ES and GK ... but we've gone over that many a time so I'll leave it. There must be reasons Elmer and the team had for stopping when they did ...

No drilling was planned for the Schaft Creek deposit during 2012. Positive results from a drilling program if considered material could have changed the Resource Estimate for the Schaft Creek deposit which would have dictated the need to update the Resource Estimate based on 2012 drill results, thereby suspending work on the feasibility study pending the updating of the Resource Estimate.

The 2012 program focused on the Schaft Creek Mineral Trend that extends from the north end of the Schaft Creek deposit for a distance of approximately 7 kilometres to the north. Two diamond drills worked on the Discovery zone and the Mike zone while at the same time mapping and sampling was completed on the 6 kilometers long area encompassing from the ES zone to the north end of the GK zone. The mapping and sampling located a significant number of mineralized outcrops and mineralized boulders in stream beds, the source of which is upstream.

http://www.copperfoxmetals.com/i/pdf/2012MDAQ3.pdf