Ah... Sweet Crystal. You don't need to start a whole new thread for every post that comes to mind LOL!

I'm not a geo specialist by far and I'm still looking at the NR but I would give it 4 out of 5 stars.

The drills show things are looking good. The SC Mineralized Trend as a geological theory/model is looking a big notch better, and Mike has gone from a pretty blob to a blob showing good potential for being mineralized (if not actually confirmed given the limited drill depth). I think the Mike zone is a few notches higher in my book. I was starting to have doubts about it.

If Mike is fully mineralized, that could change a lot for the main Paramount/SC mine. The upper rim of the old 2008 mine plan cut through half of Mike Zone. I believe that this part of the old mine plan treated this rock as un-mineralized waste rock that needed to be removed to create a save pit slope angle for digging the mineralized stuff out of Paramount. No it looks to me that this huge volume of material (say 10 to 25% of Mike's volume) would pay its way vrs being a dead cost (and a time consuming endevour).

Of course, we haven't actually poked Mike and this would all be too late to incorporate into the BFS today...but... any buyer would be able to put two and two together and see the benefits of mining waste vrs minerals.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/60356448@N04/8097015691/in/photostream/lightbox/

dyodd