If you look up the numbers of M, I and I on top of the Agoracom page or the CUU RE overview on the website, and compare with the numbers from goldminerpulse, why 10.6 M oz of Gold vs. 14.72? The moly number is different why? I'm not really too worried about it ... just don't see a rationale for some of the goldminerpulse numbers. Plus, I lean towards an NPV evaluation method extrapolated from the 2008 PFS (fuzzy extrapolated numbers, to be sure).

Metal Summary Based on Closing Prices on 2012-10-11

Metric / Metal Gold Silver Copper Molybdenum

On another note, really looking forward to the economic sensitivity analysis to shed some light on how CUU is going to value the deposit. Price fluctuations and 3 yr trailing averages can really affect the NPV outcome. Add 10billion pounds copper x $.25 extra to our cash flow. Even with a discount over years, that is a big chunk of change. Ironically the longer we wait, the more our value increases based on the 3 year prices. I'd like to see us using at least $3.25/lb for Cu but not sure if that will happen (yes, gold and silver are up, and they should offset moly's horrid decline, albeit temporary I think). So happy waiting - it sucks but maybe it means another dime a share.