Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: Jim Gray--Galore Creek
1
Sep 23, 2012 08:08AM

Sep 23, 2012 11:17AM
21
Sep 23, 2012 11:52AM
4
Sep 23, 2012 11:58AM

Sep 23, 2012 12:01PM

Sep 23, 2012 12:26PM
14
Sep 23, 2012 12:45PM
2
Sep 23, 2012 01:11PM

Sep 23, 2012 01:13PM
4
Sep 23, 2012 01:21PM

Sep 23, 2012 01:28PM

Sep 23, 2012 01:56PM
11
Sep 23, 2012 02:04PM
2
Sep 23, 2012 02:28PM

Sep 23, 2012 02:29PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 02:30PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 02:37PM
3
Sep 23, 2012 02:43PM
2
Sep 23, 2012 02:45PM
5
Sep 23, 2012 02:49PM
6
Sep 23, 2012 02:54PM
2
Sep 23, 2012 03:01PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 03:04PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 03:10PM

Sep 23, 2012 03:14PM
25
Sep 23, 2012 03:16PM
7
Sep 23, 2012 03:23PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 03:23PM
6
Sep 23, 2012 03:30PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 03:43PM
2
Sep 23, 2012 03:50PM
2
Sep 23, 2012 03:54PM
9
Sep 23, 2012 04:09PM
4
Sep 23, 2012 04:24PM

Sep 23, 2012 04:47PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 04:52PM

Sep 23, 2012 04:55PM
12
Sep 23, 2012 05:01PM
6
Sep 23, 2012 05:07PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 05:17PM

Buying back something you once owned, for a hefty mark up doesn't make anyone happy.

They are not buying back the property they once owned, they are paying for the exploration on the property. That is precisely why they are paying a multiple of the cost of exploration in order to earn back. The property alone had very little value. Now it has a substantial value.

What do you think is the goal of entering one of these contracts in the first place? Clearly they are hoping that something very large and valuable will be proven up. Do you think they would have been happier if we had found nothing and they were left with claims that were proven to be valueless?

All they have to pay for is the cost of the exploration and then they get their 75%. The further 3X that they have to spend in costs goes towards building the mine and that they would have to do anyway no matter who explored it. It's a very simple equation for Teck: do they think this property is worth the cost of the exploration?

Teck saves massive amounts of money by not exploring themselves every potential claim they make. They only have to pay for the successful ventures, not the highly speculative. I'm sure this policy is working out very well for Teck and their shareholders.

3
Sep 23, 2012 05:56PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 06:17PM
1
Sep 23, 2012 07:58PM

Sep 23, 2012 08:05PM
2
Sep 23, 2012 08:08PM
3
Sep 23, 2012 08:13PM

Sep 23, 2012 10:05PM
1
Sep 24, 2012 10:32AM
3
Sep 24, 2012 10:42AM

Sep 24, 2012 01:52PM
1
Sep 24, 2012 01:53PM
6
Sep 24, 2012 02:01PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply