To be fair.... CUU did release 3 cross sections in Nov2011 - after the Titan. I think Elmer only wants to release cross sections with some corresponding drill info. Not everything that is a lovely shade of yellow-to-pink is mineralized so assayed drill cross sections help keep our run-away expectations in check.

The Titan (started in late July) did stray up to and, in some cases, beyond the CUU claim boundaries at the time of the survey. For example, the Titan was completed very close to the Sept 2011 claims (the Marko and Mott claims) purchase and the survey included a portion of them.

Claim number 854495 (the closest Sept claim to the ES zone) (https://www.mtonline.gov.bc.ca/mtov/tenureReport.do?MTA_SPATIAL.MTA_ACQUIRED_TENURE_SVW.TENURE_NUMBER_ID=854495&lyr=MTA_ACQUIRED_TENURE_MMTO&loid=30239&x=696092.2499565613&y=1388736.131244147&imf-scale=25936.807018574473) was staked and owned by Randy Marko in May 2011 and changed to CUU on Sept 15th.

The Titan Survey NR was in Oct 2011 - only a month after CUU bought claim 854495. (http://www.copperfoxmetals.com/s/NewsReleases.asp?ReportID=485724&_Type=News-Releases&_Title=Copper-Fox-announces-a-2000000-Private-Placement-Unit-Offering.)

That brings up a question for Elmer: Why did we stray so far to the northwest with the Titan when the Aerial Mags and the CUU description/discussion of the Aerial Mags did not describe any "exploration targets" or similar for that region...?

The 3D model looks (to me) to show some larger, deeper anomalies in the northwest corner (top left) (near/in claim 854495).

3D Chargeability Model (15 MRAD) - October 2011