Welcome to the Connacher Oil and Gas Hub on AGORACOM

Connacher is a growing exploration, development and production company with a focus on producing bitumen and expanding its in-situ oil sands projects located near Fort McMurray, Alberta

Free
Message: Connacher's SAGD production is a lot better than Nexen's

Connacher's SAGD production is a lot better than Nexen's

posted on Apr 08, 2010 07:08PM

Connacher's existing production at POD 1 to date has been a lot more successful than Nexen's production at Long Lake it is evident in the attached article which appears in today's Calgary Herald .

1) Nexen's Long Lake Project has a current SOR of 5.5 (after 2 years) whereas Connacher's SOR at POD 1 is currently between 3.3 and 3.2 .

2) Nexen's Long Lake Project is currently producing 18,000 bbl/d of bitumen from it's SAGD plant which has a 60,000 bbl/d bitumen design capacity after 2 years of production compared to Connacher's POD 1 which is currently producing about 8,200 bbl/d of bitumen from it's SAGD plant which has a 10,000 bbl/d bitumen design capacity.

3) Nexen's Long Lake Project has put forth a plan to divert up to 17,000 cubic metres of water per day from the Clearwater River for its bitumen upgrader, compared to Connacher's POD 1 SAGD plant which takes its water from an underground aquifer which contains non-potable water. Connacher takes dirty water and returns super clean water back into the aquifer. (Not a good comparison here I admit).

I'm glad that I don't own Nexen shares. On the other hand Nexen is giving SAGD a bad name in the oilsands.

Environmentalists outraged over Long Lake oilsands water plan

By Dan Healing, Calgary HeraldApril 8, 2010 2:55 PMComments (34)

Nexen's Long Lake oilsands project uses steam-assisted gravity drainage technology.

Photograph by: Colleen De Neve, Calgary Herald

The operator of the Long Lake oilsands project in northern Alberta has put forward a plan to tap up to 17,000 cubic metres per day from the Clearwater River, a proposal that has outraged environmentalists.

The steam-assisted gravity drainage project south of Fort McMurray, which began steaming its underground oilsands deposits in late 2008, is producing about 18,000 barrels per day, about a third of its 60,000 barrel per day goal.

But it is using about 100,000 barrels of steam per day, a 5.5-to-one steam-oil ratio when its original plan, which called for no use of surface water, envisioned three-to-one over the life of the project.

“The Canadian Heritage Rivers Board designated the Clearwater River one of Canada’s leading rivers because it is remote and pristine and a precious part of Canadian history,” said Fort McMurray area resident Ruth Kleinbub in an article on the website of the environmental group Lake Ontario Waterkeeper.

“If a river like the Clearwater does not get the best protection possible, then there is no hope at all for less pristine areas,” added Mark Mattson, an environmental lawyer and full-time Waterkeeper based in Toronto.

David Coll, spokesman for the integrated facility owned by Nexen Inc. and Opti Canada Inc., said the original plan to use only brackish water from wells hasn’t worked out due to reliability problems with both volumes and quality of water.

“Volume is certainly key. We do need water to operate, as does any large industrial facility,” he said.

The water is needed mainly for the future operations of the bitumen upgrader, especially if Phase 2 of the project is sanctioned, but Coll denied that it indicates a failure of the upgrader, the first application of a proprietary technology called OrCrude.

The water project carries a preliminary cost estimate of $75 million to $100 million and would involve building a 35-kilometre pipeline to the river before it meets up with the Athabasca River in Fort McMurray.

Coll said the pipeline project is in the community consultation stage and no regulatory applications have been made. He said the project will need approvals from Alberta Environment, the federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Transport Canada, Alberta Sustainable Resource Development and the Alberta Energy Resources Conservation Board.

He added the project would take only 0.2 per cent of average river flow and would have less environmental impact than the network of roads and pipelines that would be need to be expanded for groundwater collection.

Analyst Mike Dunn of FirstEnergy Capital Corp. said water has been a sore spot with Long Lake for a long time but another setback won’t likely affect the partners’ share prices.

“They’ve had a lot of water treatment problems,” he said. “That project has been a big disappointment in terms of ramp up.”

The Lake Ontario Waterkeeper article says Long Lake’s request is “unprecedented” because most in situ or thermal recovery projects in Alberta’s north don’t use surface water.

But Coll pointed out that most of those projects don’t have upgraders. Oilsands companies that do, such as miners Syncrude and Suncor, take water from a river source.

Nexen is the operator and owns 65 per cent of Long Lake. Its shares closed at $25.95, up 22 cents Thursday.

Opti, which closed at $2.24, down five cents, sold part of its original 50 per cent stake to Nexen. Last year it put itself up for sale while it undertakes a strategic review process.

DHEALING@THEHERALD.CANWEST.COM

© Copyright (c) The Calgary Herald
Best Wishes; Scott
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply