"Jurek you are to be commended for making the connection between Tristone and the warrants,having said that what do you think of "mannipulation" theories now???????"

I know you are trying to provoke the response by giving the your own interpretation of facts and intentions of my post.

=As with all posting I like to get a response.

If you can, please read my original post one more time. There is no manipulation by TRISTONE or CLL management and anybody else.

=With Tristone coverage and yes a rise in Oil/bbl pricing,Connacher did have an uptik,I just happen to see this as a form of MM,this view I continue to have given the Warrants,for me both facts were known

TRISTONE just did what the common curtsy require. If your neighbour would give you a big favour (opportunity to legitimately make good money) as a good person would`t you return the favour like initiate the CLL coverage, which is in line with most professional analysts on street.

What do you think is wrong with that?

=there was money made on the coverage(buys),as there was with the warrants(sells)given this will allow me to buy in at lower price I stand to make money with this mannipulation,ie I'll be buying in the low .90s or high .80s

Even in your own analysis (CLL target of $1.6) are in the same price range. Hope you can share you finding with board member so we can all learn something instead of crying foul and manipulation every time when the CLL is down in sympathy with the TSX energy sector.

=My target is indeed the $2 range short term but longterm given what I think will be when Oil/price hits $200 Connacher should be approaching $20

I guess this would be to much to ask for.

jurek,just as my posts are open to crique so too are yours,once again cudos on your research ,you have saved myself and other participants on this site a lot of Due Dillgence..