Welcome to the Connacher Oil and Gas Hub on AGORACOM

Connacher is a growing exploration, development and production company with a focus on producing bitumen and expanding its in-situ oil sands projects located near Fort McMurray, Alberta

Free
Message: Re: Hedges

Jun 02, 2009 06:35AM
3
Jun 02, 2009 07:56AM

Jun 02, 2009 08:25AM

Jun 02, 2009 08:54AM

Jun 02, 2009 09:17AM

Jun 02, 2009 09:22AM

Jun 02, 2009 09:28AM

Jun 02, 2009 09:41AM

Jun 02, 2009 09:45AM
1
Jun 02, 2009 10:21AM

Jun 02, 2009 10:33AM
1
Jun 02, 2009 10:52AM

Jun 02, 2009 10:57AM

Jun 02, 2009 11:06AM

Jun 02, 2009 11:15AM

Jun 02, 2009 11:24AM

Jun 02, 2009 11:40AM
1
Jun 02, 2009 11:57AM
1
Jun 02, 2009 11:59AM

Jun 02, 2009 12:08PM

Jun 02, 2009 12:35PM
1
Jun 02, 2009 12:53PM

Jun 02, 2009 12:57PM
1
Jun 02, 2009 01:18PM

Jun 02, 2009 01:23PM
3
Jun 02, 2009 08:19PM
1
Jun 03, 2009 05:16AM

Jun 03, 2009 05:30AM
2
Jun 03, 2009 06:03AM
7
Jun 03, 2009 06:53AM
2
Jun 03, 2009 07:28AM
3
Jun 03, 2009 07:55AM

Oilsands08

I respect Brian's opinion and I for one like exchanging ideas with him. I find it interesting the amount of posters that show up whenever there's a concerted effort to drive down CLL SP..

I'll address your post point by point

1- I'll let readers decide for themselves if CLL made the right choice of selling their foreign assets.

http://www.petrolifera.ca/documents/...

http://www.petrolifera.ca/documents/...

2- Selling PDP shares when they were in the 20's,,that' an old discussion. My question is why would they? Why sell a company that could generate even more more later, when you can use it as collateral for financing? ALSO if CLL had sold any part of PDP it may have shaken market confidence in PDP. I'LL REPEAT ONCE AGAIN nobody saw this coming. If DG had a crystal ball then maybe he would have sold when PDP was in the 20's, I'm sure DG runs the scenario through his mind over and over again, Just like I keep kicking myself in the ass for not going liquid prior to the meltdown.

3-Few make hedges in good times as they involve risk. I'm sure that CLL analysts were saying that oil at that level was an anomaly and they were right.With oil trading way over what CLL required there was no need to.

4- Shutting down POD 1, I'd be willing to bet if oil went down to the low 20's as some were predicting, and CLL kept pumping and were forced to give a non-renewable asset away cause they had limited storage, you'd also be screaming.

5- .90 is a .50% premium over the .61 SP just 2 months ago. They needed cash not only to remain solvent, but to complete Algar ( I suppose you'd rather just let what was started rust in the field). The lending market sucks, dilution probably wasn;t DG'S first choice but it may have been conditional to replacing the previous line of credit..After all if I was a bank, it'd be pretty hard not to give a line of credit when you use the equivalent amount of cash as collateral.


CLL is a LONG term project. I as an investor understood that when I made the choice to invest. The recent events were a major setback but the company will survive and unless the demand for oil suddenly ends tomorrow, CLL has a bright future.

2
Jun 03, 2009 08:06AM

Jun 03, 2009 08:10AM
1
Jun 03, 2009 08:14AM
1
Jun 03, 2009 08:36AM
1
Jun 03, 2009 08:53AM

Jun 03, 2009 09:07AM

Jun 03, 2009 09:18AM

Jun 03, 2009 09:26AM

Jun 03, 2009 09:43AM

Jun 03, 2009 09:49AM

Jun 03, 2009 10:14AM

Jun 03, 2009 10:16AM

Jun 03, 2009 10:20AM

Jun 03, 2009 10:36AM

Jun 03, 2009 10:40AM

Jun 03, 2009 10:46AM

Jun 03, 2009 10:54AM

Jun 03, 2009 11:23AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply