SBJC ... Look I like the mine and am deciding if I should dump all my shares and recommend my associates do the same ... I think it had great potential but if you don't find a 300% increase in SGA a lot without a corresponding increase in revenue, as an investor you are pretty rare.

TA has nothing to do with the M&A side hence their is no reason to be critical of him or the team he manages. The M&A is MP's baby and apparently the justification for cost was that it is intensive ( I expect results when something is intensive and done by a competent person ... perhaps you don't) ... do you support a 300% increase in SGA without either a 300% increase in revenue or a substantial increase in share price???? .. So far we have neither with no meaninfuls signs except some pumpers running wild on the other board.

This isn't bashing any more than boatboy's posting which exhorts investors to question management's interests.

The board exists to exchange ideas ... I have exchanged mine ... since you accuse me of being an MP basher, can I ask are you and MP employee? Sail mate?

I'm not going to attempt to suppress your thoughts on this board ... just as I didn't when I was a moderator, so if you don't like my postings ... don't read them ... they seem of interest to others and apparently do not violate Agcom's principles.

orgy