Hi Doc,

I find the whole exercise to be very sad.

The old saying, "The best defense is a good offense", must be the motto of the other board.

I'm willing to give a company and its management the benefit of the doubt the first time (which I did with Jag); but, after the same pattern of promoting events which cannot be verified, and seeing the same end results, I don't believe the company has earned that opportunity.

I personally don't believe very many people any longer. That goes for the government regulators, management of business, as well as most persons I run across on the street and on message boards. It takes me longer to really develop a comfort level with them.

I have not posted anything "negative" about Jagh on the other board other than questioning the company's intentions. There is no accountability, and everything written in the filings has apparently been properly worded and documented. I learned a valuable (and costly) lesson with Nanopierce about the difference between what is legal and what is moral. I will NEVER trust management of a company, particularly a small BB or private company, without absolute facts. If that makes me a basher, well, I guess I'm a basher. I watched my original shars of Jag rocket to over $1.40, only to fall much lower ($.20s or $.30s?), then to gradually increase, and the to rocket to $1.59 with discussions by the SEC of making the playing field level. In hindsight, I believe that the Regulation SHO event allowed Quasimoto to pump the stock. When it began to collapse, I wasn't quick enough... by the time I sold everything my average was $1.12. And since that time it has continued to fall, with jumps in share price several times, but not approaching the highs of the Quasimoto adventure.

And regardless of what they say on the other board, I am prepared to reinvest if facts are presented that I believe are deserving of my trust, and my investment.

Have a great day.

Jeff