Well, maybe I should have saved the "This stinks" comment until after I mentioned how PQ and company were awarding themselves another 20% of the company for being so "supportive" as well as for their "past services", for which they have already been paid much more than was anywhere near justifiable and which is largely responsible for the outrageous dilution of both GHDC and SFMI (which "loaned" GHDC shares to pay PQ et al. when GHDC ran up against the AS limit). Would you agree that stinks?