Goldseeker keeps mentioning employees at the lab getting paid in stock. I interpret that as a good sign since those folks working in the lab know more about Recaf and it's potential that anyone else that has worked with it other than Dr. Moro. After all they are the ones testing hundreds if not thousands of samples and they are very familiar with Recafs capabilities. I'm sure there are some very intelligent people working in that lab and if they didn't beleive in Recaf they would have jumped ship months ago, I know I would. So why do they stay?

He also constantly mentions Abbott halting work on commercialization of Recaf. I don't know if that's true, nor does he, but just because Abbott is a large corporation doesn't mean they always make the right/best decisions. The decision makers usually want the biggest bang for their buck. If you recall IBM rejected DOS when Bill Gates presented it to them in the earlier years while he was employed at IBM. If they only knew. Now he's worth billions because he had a different vision than the folks at IBM and obviuosly didn't listen to the Goldseekers of the world. They also lost a large portion of their market share when personal computers first hit the market. It took them years to recover. So you can't alway use large corporations to gauge new/improved technology.