Substantial Equivalence
posted on
Apr 15, 2009 01:04PM
BioCurex's RECAF(tm) marker is found in all types of major cancers
We could have Recaf on the market in the Us in a matter of months. A 510(k) requires demonstration of substantial equivalence to another legally U.S. marketed device. Substantial equivalence means that the new device is at least as safe and effective as the predicate. A device is substantially equivalent if, in comparison to a predicate it: A claim of substantial equivalence does not mean the new and predicate devices must be identical. Substantial equivalence is established with respect to intended use, design, energy used or delivered, materials, chemical composition, manufacturing process, performance, safety, effectiveness, labeling, biocompatibility, standards, and other characteristics, as applicable.http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:... With multiple Elisa tests already on the market all we really need a 510(k) showing substantial Equivalence right? It does not say what the final intended use of the Elisa is for as long as the test is similar??? Any thoughts?
------------------------------------...
What is Substantial Equivalence
or
--------------------------------------...
LYME IgG/IgM ANTIBODY SEROLOGY
The IgG/IgM Antibody Serology test is an ELISA (enzyme linked immunoassay) which indicates the presence of both IgG and IgM antibodies to B. burgdorferi.1,2 The IgG antibody often persists long after symptoms have disappeared. The presence of antibody indicates exposure, not active disease. A positive or equivocal test must be confirmed by both IgG and IgM Western Blots.
Current FDA-approved ELISA tests are not as sensitive as they should be. While the concept of these screening tests is good, lack of sensitivity is a drawback. In spite of this, Medicare and 3rd party payers often require these tests to be ordered first.2,4
Lyme disease may begin with a skin lesion at the site of a tick bite from Ixodes scapularis or a related species. A "bull's-eye" lesion, erythema migrans (EM), is characteristic of Lyme disease; however, only 60% of patients positive for Lyme exhibit the rash.3-5
The IgG/IgM ELISA is the most commonly used screening test for the primary diagnosis of Lyme disease. This test is recommended at least four weeks after exposure. Patients with the diagnosis of Lyme disease based on clinical history have positive IgG/IgM serology results within one year of the tick bite approximately 70% of the time. The percentage of patients with a positive serology is reduced in subsequent years.5
Ordering multiple tests, such as the ELISA, Western Blot, Antigen Capture, and PCR, is significantly more efficient in a clinical diagnosis than is any single test.
Figure 2. A typical early symptom of Lyme disease is the slowly expanding bull's-eye red rash, erythema migrans (EM)
LYME IgM ANTIBODY SEROLOGY
The Lyme IgM antibody assay is another serologic test in ELISA format, and it detects the presence of IgM antibodies after exposure to an infected tick. Because IgM antibodies appear early in response to infection, this test may be positive two to six weeks after exposure.1,2 The level of IgM rapidly declines over time. A positive or equivocal IgM antibody test must be confirmed by an IgM Western Blot. The sensitivity concerns mentioned for the IgG/IgM assay also affect this assay.
Appropriate antibiotic therapy during the early stage (the first four months) of Lyme disease can reduce the likelihood of late stage disease.
The IgM response may persist in patients with prolonged illness, and a new IgM response may appear late in persistent or recurrent disease, or from re-infection.6
This test is recommended approximately 2 weeks after suspected exposure and should also be ordered late in the disease with the return of acute symptoms. http://www.igenex.com/lymeset3.htm
Figure 3. The spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi
IGeneX, Inc.
795 San Antonio Rd., Palo Alto, CA 94303 USA
Tel. 650.424.1191 / 800.832.3200 Fax. 650.424.