Your interpretation of the events that transpired between Abbott and Biocurex make good sense to me, more so than the dooms day scenerios constantly presented by Goldseeker.

I can't help but believe Dr. Moro was very confident some sort of revenue stream was very close in order for him to forego the milestone payments by Abbott in lieu of the higher royalty payments. Remember back in October, Dr. Moro said, "we will soon be reaching our ultimate goal of commercializing our Recaf technology. He also said Biocurex will start pulling in significant revenue. Key word here being "will" not may. Why else would Smithline renegotiate their financial agreement with Biocurex if they too were confident a revenue stream was close.

This explains why Goldseeker has intensified his constant negative post against Biocurex. I still don't beleive he ever sold his shares of Biocurex as he claims. Why wouldn't he hold on to his shares and ride out the storm like the rest of us decide to do? After all he never presented any proof of the sale which would be very easy to do. I think he made that claim to present himself as a disgruntled shaeholder to justify his relentless bashing. He probably doesn't get paid for his bashing, however I do believe he continues to purchase all the shares he can at these prices.

It appears Abbott elected a different path than originally agreed upon between them and Dr. Moro, hence the renegotiations of their license agreement. I wonder which path Inverness chose to take. They too have been very secretive about their work with Recaf.

Oh, well I'm sure this will keep Gold busy through most of the weekend. Thanks for sharing your thoughts with the board. I guess I should thank Gold also, since he has helped me pick up more shares at a very low price compared to what I paid for some of my original shares @ $3.14/share.

JMHO