VALUE THROUGH PRODUCTION AND DISCOVERY

Focused on the Exploration and Development through Partnership of its portfolio of Porphyry Copper Targets

Free
Message: Re: Kabba Grades & Size
1
Mar 10, 2009 01:08PM
1
Sas
Mar 11, 2009 07:37AM

Mar 11, 2009 10:25AM

Mar 12, 2009 06:39AM
1
Mar 12, 2009 01:37PM

Mar 13, 2009 06:09AM

Mar 13, 2009 01:00PM
1
Mar 16, 2009 07:03AM

Mar 16, 2009 10:53AM
1
vdf
Mar 17, 2009 07:20AM

DL
Mar 17, 2009 11:37AM

Sas
Mar 18, 2009 06:26AM

Apr 23, 2009 07:13AM

Apr 23, 2009 10:18AM
2
Apr 23, 2009 11:46AM

Apr 24, 2009 06:06AM

Apr 24, 2009 06:54AM

"With the size that Dr. Marsh knows this deposit will be (from the KNOWN root zone), the grade will only have to be .4% or so (which is the average grade in Arizona porphories apparently)"

Gryphon,

Given your access to Dr. Marsh, could you ask him to enlighten us on 'average grades' vis a vis 'tonnage'. Not so much in Arizona in general but specifically along the highly productive Copper Creek-Resolution-Bagdad porphyry trend where Kabba sits.

Along this mineralised trend Phelps Dodge is currently expanding its 200 million pounds of annual copper production capacity from the Bagdad Mine. Mercator Minerals is now producing at its Mineral Park Mine, which has proven and probable mill reserves of 437 million tons at a copper equivalent grade of 0.368%, and Rio Tinto has indicated over 1 billion tons of copper ore averaging over 1.5% copper at Resolution.

My understanding was that Bell was looking for significantly higher grades than 0.04%. According to a GoldLetter special report (Sept. '08):

"Bell targets for Kabba at least 500 million tons of oxide, enriched sulphide and primary sulphide ore at a mean grade of near 1% copper and 0.02% molybdenum, for gross in-situ metal value near $ 20 billion."

So how much approx. tonnage do we need for a lower grade of .4% to be economic?





Apr 25, 2009 11:28AM

Apr 25, 2009 05:45PM

Apr 25, 2009 10:27PM

Apr 26, 2009 04:33AM

Apr 26, 2009 12:40PM

Apr 26, 2009 08:33PM

Apr 27, 2009 07:57AM

vdf
Apr 28, 2009 06:35AM

Apr 28, 2009 10:58AM

vdf
Apr 29, 2009 07:14AM

Apr 29, 2009 11:16AM

vdf
Apr 30, 2009 08:17AM

Sas
Apr 30, 2009 10:41AM
1
May 01, 2009 06:10AM

Sas
May 01, 2009 10:39AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply