When you make your final decision, it must be respected by all. Who could find fault with it?

But you have been one of the most stalwart advocates of bringing the BOD to account. Apparently, you haven't received the "Offeror's Notice" as yet. Once you do, you really don't have to do anything. Only if you then choose to dissent do you need to act.

Perhaps you could consider holding off a bit? Unless of course, having reached the 'towel-throwing-in' stage, other priorities come into play.

Then again, is it a pipe dream to think we could enough support to obtain qualified legal advice? Some that left for the Kinross Forum still have ARU shares, I believe. I am not sure that it is now worthwhile to ask 'someone' (who?) to do a poll for potential supporters. One thing, complex as the Act appears, fighting for fair value should be much more straightford than a claim for damages as per the Britnick initiative.

Thinking of Britnick who said he was leaving for awhile, did he post something other than the geologist's report, something that definitively said that the proposed legal action has been abandoned? If so, I missed it and would appreciate someone posting the reference.

Regards, Orange Flash