The next step is to find someone who can clearly state from an expert perspective that these results where material (as we all know they are intuitively), and therefore their statements that all material information was released can be proven to be a breech of their fiduciary duty, and more importantly, was a breach of insider trading and as such Kinross management are also liable for misleading statements.

If the drill results that were just released showed no gold or silver at all they would have been considered material because they would have shown that there was no continuity in previously reported drill results and the deposit was not as big as expected.

By simple logic this means that these drill holes are material in nature as they show that the very strong grades continue between the 100 meter lines previously drilled.

The expert opinion you are looking for will be great when/if you go to court but will not be completed before Sept 3. You will need an expert from the same "old boys club" that said they weren't material.