Welcome To The 300 Club HUB On AGORACOM

We may not make much money, but we sure have a lot of fun!

Free
Message: Interesting related to BAKKEN ...

Bakken Update: CARBO Ceramics Has A Good Quarter, But The Same Problems Persist

Jul 28 2013, 06:06 | by: Michael Filloon

Disclosure: I am long KOG, OAS, TPLM. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. (More...)

CARBO Ceramics (CRR) posted a better than expected quarter. This pushed its share price up to its best day in quite some time. Although it beat on the top and bottom lines, there could still be significant problems going forward. CARBO's business has changed significantly since 2009. Early that year, its business began to grow quickly based on increased business from horizontal wells in several basins throughout the United States. This company has several businesses, but ceramic proppant was the basis for its growth, and is still a large part of its business. Demand for ceramic proppant was great, but we have seen a significant decline in market share in years since. It is important to note that ceramic proppant has been needed in wells deeper than 8000 feet. Well pressures increase at these depths, crushing sand and ceramic coated sand. In 2009, there were little by the way of other options, so operators would pay a significant premium in areas like the Bakken. Companies now have other options, which has decreased market share and margins.

In Q2 of 2013, CARBO announced an EPS of $.71/share versus the Street's estimate of $.67. It also beat on the top line with revenues of $153.7 million versus estimates of $146 million. Keep in mind, revenues decreased year over year. In Q2 of 2012, it reported $177.6 million. EPS for the same time frame was $1.38/share. It is not surprising CARBO's proppant business is improving. Many of the biggest unconventional plays in the United States are moving to pad development. What this means is operators have drilled the majority of its acreage, and it is now held by production. "Held by production" is a provision in an oil or natural gas property lease that allows the lessee, generally an energy company, to continue drilling activities on the property as long as it is producing a minimum paying amount of oil or gas. The "held by production" provision thereby extends the lessee's right to operate the property beyond the initial lease term. This provision is also a feature of mineral property leases. This protects a land owner from and oil and gas company indefinitely holding the lease and not providing oil and gas royalty payments. Once the acreage is held by production, the operator can develop as it wants. The shift to pad drilling is mainly done for economic reasons. A rig will drill a large number of wells very close together and these wells can be completed at the same time, which are called zipper fracs. Wells are drilled and completed in a much shorter amount of time, which decreases costs significantly. In Q1 of 2013, many operators started pad drilling. This leaves a very large number of wells to be completed in Q2. This will continue in Q3, with a possible decrease in Q4. The Q4 decrease doesn't have to happen, but some operators will trim capital budgets in the last month of the year leaving a large inventory for Q1 of 2014. What this all means is there were a better number of completions in Q2 which increased demand for ceramic proppant.

Improvements in demand for CARBO's ceramic proppant could be due to several different reasons. As stated above, more wells are being completed. Laterals are getting longer, source rock stimulation is improving requiring more proppant per well. This has decreased inventories of Chinese ceramic proppant that are much cheaper than CARBO's. Chinese proppant continues to steal market share. It is produced and sold cheaply to operators in the United States. Cost savings are substantial, and with focus on well costs, operators continue to use it. Although some believe it has lessor quality, customers continue to buy which tells me operators see value in Chinese ceramic proppant.

CARBO's ceramic proppant sales volumes were down 5% sequentially, but grew 8% in the United States. For the quarter, it sold 378 million pounds of ceramic proppant. This compares to 440 million in Q2 of 2012. It exited Q2 with improving margins, which is one of the biggest variables in the markets run up of CARBO's stock price over the past couple of days. It only increased 1% due to mix. This is important, as pricing pressures have persisted over the last year and a half. Carbo continues to see high inventory levels of ceramic coated sand in the United States. This continues to pressure margins, although it did sell more than in Q1. Year over year, it saw a large increase in sales of resin coated sand. In Q2 of 2013, it sold 68 million pounds, versus just 14 million for the same quarter in 2012.

The most pressing issue I have begun to see in horizontal applications within the United States are a switching to all sand fracs. From 2006 to 2008, operators had started using ceramic proppant leaseholds targeting formation deeper than 8000 feet. Due to the expense, many decided to use a mix of sand and ceramic proppant. In 2010 and 2011, wells were using sixty to seventy percent sand and the remainder in ceramic proppant. Newer frac technologies are beginning to stimulate the source rock with shorter, wider fractures. It was initially thought a well would perform better with long thin fracs. The idea was to reach as deep into the formation as possible trying to connect with natural fracturing increasing the flow of overall resource. The shorter, wider fractures have brought about a different mix of proppant. EOG Resources (EOG) was the first to successfully use this tech. By focusing the hydraulic horsepower closer to the well bore, the shale is pulverized. Greater surface area is fracced, and in turn needs larger volumes of proppant. More importantly, these wells use no ceramic proppant. Below I have listed several wells with a completion design focused within a radius of 300 feet from the well bore. The first table shows how EOG's well design compares to other operators in the Bakken.

Well Operator Lateral Choke Stages H2O Proppant
21378 EOG 6475 24/64 32 79855 6867099
22587 Statoil (STO) 9930 128/64 39 92489 3883780
22868 Whiting (WLL) 8437 48/64 22 24731 1716416
21182 Kodiak (KOG) 9304 34/64 19 50574 1546067
21884 Continental (CLR) 9597 30/64 39 68090 3828310
21912 Hess (HES) 9300 28/64 30 36329 1285745
22350 Oasis (OAS) 10020 68/64 28 66254 3507779
19738 Triangle (TPLM) 9657 30/64 31 82504 3918293

As you can see above, EOG uses large volumes of sand per foot. Keep in mind this is all sand, where operators like Kodiak and Triangle use large amounts of ceramic proppant. Other operators like Hess and Whiting use lessor volumes. This data gets better when we break it down in a per foot basis.

Well Feet/Stage Proppant/Stage Proppant/Foot Water/Foot
21378 202 214597 1061 12.3
22587 255 99584 391 9.3
22868 384 78019 203 2.9
21182 490 81372 166 5.4
21884 246 98162 399 7.1
21912 310 42858 138 3.9
22350 358 125278 350 6.6
19738 312 126397 406 8.5

The table above shoes EOG uses more than twice the proppant per foot as any other operator. To show the effect on production per foot with respect to the 90-Day IP rate, I have added the table below. This table is of EOG wells only.

File No. 90-Day IP Lateral Choke Stages

Water

Proppant

21378 793 6475 24/64

32

3433765 6867099
21239 1101 8309 30/64 42 4596164 9023010
21194 783 9562 36/64 37 874491 1705785
20691 348 10543 24/64 42 2457665 4246618
20038 663 12185 30/64 42 2325913 4864841
20255 780 12236 32/64 41 2433929 4182144
20890 768 9665 12/64 22 2769759 4052313
20886 587 9648 8/64 31 3235492 4383583
20332 N/A 6144 34/64 25 1912984 2862341
20067 N/A 9417 38/64 38 2198891 3710788

In the table above, the top two wells use the new completion design. These wells significantly outproduced its other wells when we take into account lateral length. These production improvements have motivated Whiting to adopt the same type of completions. This means it will use no ceramic proppant, but three to four times the sand by volume.

EOG has had the same type of excellent results in the Eagle Ford. The table below is a list of some of the best wells ever in this play. Most of these wells were in and around Gonzales County.

Well Choke Lateral Proppant Proppant/foot

32473 - 32477

32/64 5499 8-10MM 1637
32636 36/64 4510 8.55MM 1896
32569 40/64 5126 11.16MM 2177
32617 34/64 4111 10.01MM 2435
32536 32/64 3775 5.82MM 1542
35079 34/64 6293 9.53MM 1514
34951 34/64 6373 10.09MM 1583
33141 36/64 6489 10.04MM 1547
33143 36/64 6599 10.12MM 1534

This has revolutionized the way wells are completed in the Eagle Ford. Production has been off the charts on a per foot basis. As an example, I added the chart below to provide IP rates of wells in this area.

Well IP Oil IP NGL IP Gas
Baker-Deforest Unit 1H 3346 457 2.7
Baker-Deforest Unit 2H 4216 537 3.2
Baker-Deforest Unit 4H 4598 488 2.9
Boothe Unit 1H 5380 625 3.6
Boothe Unit 2H 3810 252 3.0
Burrow Unit 1H 5424 600 3.5
Burrow Unit 2H 6331 713 4.1
Henkhaus Unit 8H 4012 495 3.0
Reilly Unit 1H 3579 483 2.9

These are some of the best horizontal results in the United States. All of the wells are short laterals with an average choke. As an example, I have provided a table below of Penn Virginia's (PVA) well results in Gonzales County. The acreage is similar and close to EOG's.

Well IP Rate (Boe/d)
Gardner 1H 1247
Hawn Holt 9H 1877
Hawn Holt 2H 986
Fojtik 1H 1209
Othold 1H 1629
Martinsen 1H 1878
Dubose 2H 864

The above wells use 4 to 5 million pounds of proppant. These wells are not even comparable from a production standpoint. EOG produces three to four times the oil that Penn Virginia produced including NGLs and natural gas.

These results should be worrisome for CARBO, as it would seem more operators will start moving to this completion style, like Whiting did this last quarter. Costs are relatively close to the same, as Whiting stated within 5%. As the same time, production increases substantially, and this is without any ceramic proppant.

In summary, there are still significant hurdles for CARBO to cross going forward. It continues to sell less ceramic proppant, even as we see more proppant used per well in the United States. Chinese products are getting cheaper. This pressures margins, as operators will not spend more on proppant unless the results warrant it. A few years ago, operators believed CARBO was inflating prices as demand was high and there were few other options. Operators believe CARBO's product is better, but it is difficult to know if the added cost will pay for itself. Operators are also finding it does not need the high end proppant for wells 10,000 feet and below. We are beginning to see companies try different types and gauge effectiveness from those results. Triangle Petroleum had recently made a switch to lighter ceramics, and got close to the same results in a very deep section of McKenzie County, North Dakota. Its stock buyback and dividend increases add upside. It also has a new proppant for ultra-deep reservoir applications. This focuses on depths greater than 30,000 feet. I believe this could be a decent area of growth for the company, given its ability to produce stronger, more consistent proppant for high pressure completion jobs. This was a very good quarter, but I would recommend watching this stock closely as we still do not know if it has found a bottom. This company still has considerable headwinds, and I do not believe we have seen the last of lower margins and market share.

Additional disclosure: This is not a buy recommendation. The projections or other information regarding the likelihood of various investment outcomes are hypothetical in nature, are not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness, do not reflect actual investment results, do not take in consideration commissions, margin interest and other costs, and are not guarantees of future results. All investments involve risk, losses may exceed the principal invested, and the past performance of a security, industry, sector, market or financial product does not guarantee future results or returns. For more articles like this check out our website at shaleexperts.com. Fracwater Solutions L.L.C. engages in industrial water solutions for oil and gas companies in North Dakota. This includes constructing water depots, pipelines and disposal wells. It also provides contracting services for all types of construction at well sites. Other services include soil remediation. Please contact me via email if you are interested in working with us. More of my articles and other pertinent information on the oil and gas sector, go to shaleexperts.com.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply