Re: Mish Shedlock vs. Ted Butler
in response to
by
posted on
Mar 08, 2011 03:34PM
We may not make much money, but we sure have a lot of fun!
As a follow-up, no conspiracy is proven because the conspiracists control those who do the proving, or find ways to dismiss the Booksley Born types ... Oh, that's convenient. You can't prove it because the conspiracy controls anyone who might be able to? Well then it must be true. Of course the conspiracy doesn't control GATA, right? They're the lone exception here. Shedlock is either a myopic memeber of the sheople or a paid defender of the manipulators. That's a bit harsh isn't it? Guy writes something you don't agree with, ergo he's part of the conspiracy? But since you can't prove it, that makes it what? An article of faith? Really, this gold suppression "theory" sounds more like a religion with each passing day. Butler`s motivations seems clearer and purer than Shedlock`s and the bankers. Butler makes a good living off the gulli-bulls. I don't think you need look further than that for a motive. As for his pal Murphy, next time you see him, ask him about the CFTC fine for trading violations he got tagged with in the late 80's. Don't know about you, but one way I judge people is by the company they keep. ebear