Welcome To The 300 Club HUB On AGORACOM

We may not make much money, but we sure have a lot of fun!

Free
Message: Is this the end of 'naked short selling' ........Jim Sinclair

Is this the end of 'naked short selling' ........Jim Sinclair

posted on May 01, 2009 12:06PM

Dear Comrades In Golden Arms,


Dear Jim,

Can junior gold stock holders finally breathe a sigh of relief regarding Naked Shorting in your opinion?

CIGA Ken

Dear Ken,

To a degree, yes.

This would explain the recent hatchet job on the AMEX junior gold with the 7th largest short on the exchange.

Regards,
Jim

High & Low Finance
Goodbye to Naked Shorting
By FLOYD NORRIS
Published: April 30, 2009

In some circles, those are fighting words. There are companies that blame all their problems on that kind of trading, which is illegal if it is intended to manipulate the market. There are claims that it has destroyed thousands of public companies, although those making the claims have trouble naming any such companies.

But now, it appears, naked shorting - the practice of selling shares short without borrowing them - is almost gone. The Securities and Exchange Commission's hurried changes of short-selling rules last fall appear to have all but eliminated the number of companies where such selling seems to be occurring. This appears to be an example of regulation working.

The primary example of the decline in naked short-selling is in the shares of Overstock.com, an Internet retailer whose chief executive, Patrick M. Byrne, has for years been on what he called a "jihad" against such trading. Overstock has sued many Wall Street firms for facilitating such trading, as well as a hedge fund and a research firm that it believes acted illegally in spreading negative information about the company. The suits have not yet gone to trial.

The primary evidence of naked short-selling is a large number of trades where shares were not delivered on time, causing a "fail" in Wall Street jargon. Naked short-selling can save a trader the costs of borrowing shares, or can make it possible to short a stock where borrowing is very difficult because so many others want to sell it short. A large number of fails does not prove naked short-selling, since there are other reasons for trades to fail, but such a number does indicate it is likely.

Critics of naked short-selling often say it produces "counterfeit shares," but that term is misleading. Any short-seller, naked or not, takes on the same economic risks. If the price rises, the trader will lose money. If it falls, he will profit.

More...
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply